The 'main' Impeach Obama blog site can be found at:  http://impeachobama2013.blogspot.com the site you are on now has most, but not all, of the posts, so book mark the above site rather than this one.

==============================================

Oklahoma Tragedy gives Mr. O a breathing space:

Just when two more shoes were about to drop for Mr. Obama he caught a break when the Oklahoma tornados took those items off the nations news programs. Whether or not the reports will have any impact three days from now remains to be seen.

You can expect that the news media will be totally wrapped up with tornado coverage plus the obligatory visit by Mr. Obama to the scene. 

So for the moment the two 'new' items are pretty much on hold and Obama gets a grace period of about 72 hours to show some 'leadership'. Even a Cook County Political Organizer should be able to milk some positive reports out of this tragedy.

IRS Investigation: Top White House Staffers Were Briefed On Conclusions, Didn't Tell Obama
WASHINGTON -- White House Press Secretary Jay Carney acknowledged on Monday that senior staffers to President Barack Obama were informed in late April that a forthcoming audit of the IRS would reveal that officials there had targeted conservative groups. Nevertheless, Carney said, they did not warn the president about the scandal soon to hit his administration.
Details at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/irs-investigation_n_3308037.html?1369077709&icid=maing-grid10%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl2%7Csec1_lnk1%26pLid%3D315903

Outrage Over Targeting of Fox News
DOJ Calls Fox News Reporter James Rosen 'Co-Conspirator' In Leak Case; Journalists Outraged

The Justice Department is under fire again for explosive claims that it has been closely and surreptitiously monitoring Fox News.A news article about how the Obama administration tracked the movements and correspondence of a Fox News reporter led to a fresh round of condemnation by journalists on Monday.

The Washington Post published an explosive story about the Justice Department's monitoring of James Rosen, a Fox News reporter based in Washington. Rosen allegedly spoke to Stephen Jin-Woo Kim, a State Department contractor, for a story about North Korea's nuclear program. The Justice Department charged Kim with violating the Espionage Act for his contact with Rosen.
Details at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/james-rosen-justice-department-co-conspirator-obama_n_3305857.html?icid=maing-grid10%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl8%7Csec1_lnk1%26pLid%3D315881

=============================================================

(Even the left wing press is finally seeing that Mr. Obama is a total writeoff as President.  Seems to me it took them long enough to figure out what the rest of us already knew for years.  Maybe now some of them will crawl out of his back pocket)
 

==================================== 

Jake Tapper: Obama Is 'Squashing Freedom Of The Press' (VIDEO)

CNN's Jake Tapper took aim at President Obama's policies towards the media on Thursday.

Obama addressed the scandal surrounding the Justice Department's secret probe into the Associated Press during his press conference with the prime minister of Turkey. Journalists and press watchdogs have been outraged by both the breadth and the covert nature of the probe. The Justice Department has justified the investigation as part of its crackdown on national security leaks that wind up in the media.

Obama said he respected the role of a free press and voiced support for a new media shield bill, but added that he made "no apologies" for going after leaks:

See entire article and video at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/16/jake-tapper-obama-leaks-ap_n_3287454.html
====================================
Just my opinion:

What to watch for in coming months:

I expect that Carl Rove will shortly have some statistics for this on one of his white boards, but here is my opinion FYI.

 

You will see Democratic Representatives and Senators in districts and states where they could in normal times expect a challenge to re-election decide that it is a good time to retire. So the old hands will bow out now rather than face a very difficult re-election effort.

Obviously we will retain the House, even in 'normal' times the party in power expects to have some loss but with Mr. Obama having such serious problems those normal losses will be greatly exceeded and the Republicans can expect a serious increase in numbers in the House.

In the Senate there was a faint hope we could reach 50, but now with Obama having so many problems it is a good bet that we will take control of the Senate also.

So Mr. Obama's bad news is actually good news as we will soon have both houses of Congress back in Republican hands at the next election.

 

=================================================================

Jason Chaffetz: Obama Impeachment Still 'Within The Realm Of Possibilities'

As calls for President Barack Obama's impeachment continue to circulate from Republican voices, one Congressman stands by that possibility.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) appeared on Tuesday's edition of CNN's "The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer," addressing his suggestion that Obama face that stiff a penalty.

I was simply asked: 'is that within the realm of possibilities?' And I would say ‘yes.’ I'm not willing to take that off the table."

"That’s not the goal but given the continued lies perpetrated by this administration, I don’t know where it’s going to go," Chaffetz said.

Other members of the Republican Party see impeachment as too severe an option.

Contact the Representative at:
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah)
2464 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Phone: 202-225-7751  Fax: 202-225-5629

F.Y.I.:  House and Senate members will usually only respond to people from their own District or State.  Faxing or writing is best, just don't expect a reply if you don't provide an address from their District or State.

 

Full article w/video at:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/jason-chaffetz-obama-impeachment_n_3276107.html

Are they coming for you?

First Mr. Obama's IRS came for the Tea Party members,
and I didn’t speak up,
because I wasn’t a Tea Party member.

 

Then Mr. Obama's DOJ came for the Journalists,
and I didn’t speak up,
because I wasn't a Journalist.

Then Mr. Obama came after the Republicans,

and I didn’t speak up,
because I wasn’t a Republican.


Then Mr. Obama came for me,
and by that time there was no one
left to speak up for me.

How many strikes before Mr Obama is 'Out'?

In baseball it is '3 strikes and you are out'. Will that work in Washington for Obama? That remains to be seen.

Here Mr. Obama has 3 strikes:
1)   Benghazi Gate
2)   IRS scrutiny of tax exempt conservative groups
3)    Secret Monitoring of Press

You might still be catching up on the phone records scandal which has been described by the LA Times as: "Justice Department secretly obtained AP telephone records"

Readers should remember just how in the bag that the
press has been for Mr. Obama. 80% of the press have been in his back pocket so long that they no longer make any pretence of being impartial.

It must be a major shock to the left wing journalists and broadcasters that the Obama Justice Dept would secretly reach out for their phone records after all they have done for him over the last half dozen years.

Clearly Mr. Obama would not be President without their continual fawning over him. My opinion is that they are now seeing just how corrupt that this administration is and always has been. They are getting just what they deserve.

Below are CNN and LA Times articles on this-

AP blasts feds for phone records search
by Matt Smith and Joe Johns, CNN
updated 9:47 PM EDT, Mon May 13, 2013

(CNN) -- The Justice Department secretly collected two months of telephone records for reporters and editors at The Associated Press, the news service disclosed Monday in an outraged letter to Attorney General Eric Holder.

The records included calls from several AP bureaus and the personal phone lines of several staffers, AP President Gary Pruitt wrote. Pruitt called the subpoenas a "massive and unprecedented intrusion" into its reporting.

"These records potentially reveal communications with confidential sources across all of the newsgathering activities undertaken by the AP during a two-month period, provide a road map to AP's newsgathering operations and disclose information about AP's activities and operations that the government has no conceivable right to know," wrote Pruitt, the news agency's CEO.

Full story at:
http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/13/us/justice-ap-phones/index.html and also at: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-justice-department-obtained-ap-records-20130513,0,1712953.story

Watergate finished Nixon - Will Benghazi finish Obama? Impeachment Looms.

While I do have two blog sites with Impeach Obama in them, further down my sites I say that it is unlikely to happen but it is worth calling for just to give Mr. Obama something to think about in the hopes he will moderate his positions.

Now I am not sure that this is correct, the Benghazi issue may well be the undoing of Obama.

It is so clear now that there was a major effort to 'cover up' this lack of response to the then ongoing murders in Lybia by the administration that it seems impossible that even the regular stooges for Mr. Obama in Congress can derail such a movement.

If Nixon can be fourced out of office for Watergate and if Clinton can be Impeached for screwing in the Oval Office annex, then surely Obama having the State Department cover up his errors in the run up to a close election should be enough to at least have the Articles of Impeachment voted on in the House.

One thing is written in stone: There will be no run for President by Hillary Clinton, she is now totally discredited.

John McCain Refuses To Back Impeaching Obama Over Benghazi

Full article is found at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/12/mccain-obama-benghazi_n_3262489.html

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) refused to sign on to calls to possibly impeach President Barack Obama over Benghazi.

WASHINGTON -- As Republicans are increasingly calling the Obama administration's response to the Benghazi attacks a cover-up worse than Watergate and even floating impeachment, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) urged a note of caution on Sunday, saying he wasn't yet willing to go that far.

"With all due respect, I think this is a serious issue," said McCain on ABC's "This Week." "I will even give the president the benefit of the doubt on some of these things. We need a select committee."

On Thursday, Senate Armed Services Committee Ranking Member James Inhofe (R-Okla.) accused President Barack Obama of overseeing "the most egregious cover-up in American history." He added that "people may be starting to use the 'I word'" before long.

-------------------------------------------------------------------


Don't forget to take a look at:  http://m.youtube.com/?client=mv-google#/watch?v=rqtJrJ40Cio

The below paragraphs are an exert from a Wall Street Journal article, the entire article is to long for the blog site but you can use the direct link to read it in full.

Most readers will agree that we are lacking in any leadership from Mr. Obama.  This sort of nonsense is what you should expect when we elect a Cook County 'Political Organizer' as President of the country.

The 2 Obama elections were simply a national act of Political Correctness, done to show the world that we are not all a bunch of knuckle dragging racists.  Actions have consequences and for the next four years we will be stuck with a President that is now, and always has been, in way over his head.


Henninger: Presidential Followership

What an uncertain world needs now is American presidential leadership. Instead, it's getting presidential followership.

by DANIEL HENNINGER - Wall Street Journal

Full article at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324766604578457033232792430.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_sections_opinion

 

"At the president's news conference Tuesday, when a reporter wondered whether setbacks on gun control and the sequester suggested Mr. Obama was having problems pushing his second-term agenda, the president replied, "Well if you put it that way, Jonathan, maybe I should just pack up and go home."

The U.S.—and the world—are only four months into Mr. Obama's additional 48-month tenure as American president. The U.S. and the world are at the edge of political and economic instability. What's needed now is U.S. presidential leadership. What it looks like we and the world are getting instead is presidential followership. Or worse, presidentially-induced confusion.

Whatever the Obama agenda may be, he's got 40 more months. Or maybe less than that. If the president's standing with the American public declines, his goal of taking back the House next year becomes more improbable than ever. Democratic politicians with campaigns to run will head for the tall weeds. When that happens, what's left?"

=======================================================


Here is a section of another of my own blogs which is found at: http://syriaandislam.blogspot.com/


Just my opinion - Syria, Islam and the West

Readers 40 years of age or younger will, during the course of their lifetime, have to deal with a world where 1 in 3 people are Muslim (now it is 1 in 5). In 40 years there will be 10 Billion people on the planet, 3 1/2 Billion Muslims.

This is generally bad news for non-Muslims, particularly in light of the radical elements within that religion who hold the view that all non-Muslims are infidels and should be either converted, killed or enslaved.

Keep in mind that Islam is not the only religion to espouse the idea that they are the 'true' religion and that non-believers will never reach heaven. What other religions hold this view? Try the Catholic Church and the Jewish faith. So Islam isn't alone, at least in that respect.

What then should we 'do' about Islam?

In the short term I suggest we not further involve ourselves in Islamic countries. We have not done a very good job so far, why would we believe that we will do better with further meddling?

I note that there are humanitarians who are agitating for the US to get involved in Syria and help to depose the current regime. True 70,000+ have been killed so far. So from a humanitarian perspective it would seem that some action should be taken.

Examine this a bit further. An entirely hostile country, one that was a sworn enemy of Israel and had no relations with the US, is now in the process of reducing itself to rubble. Where is the downside to this? The country is self destructing and will not in coming years be capable of posing a threat to Israel, Lebanon or us. We should simply stay out of it, there is no upside to any meddling, both sides will turn on us, any weapons we provide will probably end up used against the West by the radical Islamic elements who have poured into Syria.

Put bluntly, while they are killing each other they are not killing us. A harsh statement but how is it wrong?

Possibly the only things that we (the West) have going for us in the coming 40 years is that Islam is not one great monolith. It is fractured and may well come apart without any necessity for conflict with the West.


Consider that:

1)  The Persians and Arabs have been great rivals for well over a thousand years, they 1) just don't like each other,

2)  There is a deep divide in Islam between the radicals and the moderates, the radicals for the moment are in the ascendency but are far outnumbered by the moderate Muslims who see little being gained by their barbaric brethren,

3)  Since the founding of their religion the Shia and Suni branches of Islam have been at war with each other, this isn't going to change, each side views the other as being blasphemers and apostates of their religion.

The short term recommendation is to stay out of social engineering in Islamic countries, there is no 'good side' to be found.

Long term we may find Islam so divided and fractured that they pose no threat to Western interests.

Q)   What should be of concern to us?

A)   China

Here is a site you might wish to look at every few days.  If you sign up for automatic notificiations you might end up with hearing from them more than you want, they do put out a lot of material.  Take a look at:  http://www.westernjournalism.com/, email them at:  wcj@westernjournalism.com


-------------------------------------------------------------
Drone Strike To Kill U.S. Citizen On American Soil Legal

March 8th Update on this issue:  The headlines read: "Rand Paul Revolts Against the Tyranny of DRONES! I will not let Obama ‘shred the Constitution’"

Both Republicans and a few Democrats reacted harshly to the Attorney General and the White House's initial claims that it was just fine to kill Americans in the USA with drone strikes. Even the international press had a field day with embarassing America with such stupidity.

In response to Rand Paul, a 43 word letter from Holder acknowledges that Mr. "Obama Has No Authority For Drone Strikes Against Americans On U.S. Soil," White House Says.

For details see Huffington Post report at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/07/obama-drone-strikes_n_2830174.html

=================================================
 

(March 5th) Eric Holder: Drone Strike To Kill U.S. Citizen On American Soil Legal, Hypothetically

WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration believes it could technically use military force to kill an American on U.S. soil. . . U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a letter disclosed Tuesday. . . in theory, it'd be legal for the president to order such an attack under certain circumstances, Holder said.

"For example, the president could conceivably have no choice but to authorize the military to use such force if necessary to protect the homeland in the circumstances like a catastrophic attack like the ones suffered on December 7, 1941, and September ,2001,"


 

Just how screwed up is Mr. O?

 

We can't water board terrorists and he wants to close Gitmo, but he also claims to have the authority to use drones to kill Americans in the USA?  This is just another reason that we made a major mistake in electing him.

 

In the 2014 elections we must bring the Senate under Republican control so that we can put the brakes on this political organizer.

There are quite a lot of sites on the topic of impeaching Obama.

Some of them are listed at: http://stop-obama-now.net/impeach-obama-coalition/#comment-13085 which also has put together the below 'List of Offenses' which you might want to take a look at.  

Also see this U Tube item at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEZNKB33U9c&feature=youtu.be

The right of the people to peaceably assemble -:

The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution provides in part that: "Congress shall make no law. . .prohibiting. . .the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances"

Updated Info:  25 people demonstrated for over 2 hours in San Diego Sat. 2/16 to make the point that the Obama administration is out of control and 20,000 vehicles passing by on the freeway are now informed that not all of us are impressed with how the country is being run.

If you have 5 minutes to invest in a UTube video you can see the demonstration at:  http://youtu.be/LUyNVZz9CZk  It is well put together and accompanied by a nice rendition of 'The Battle Hym of the Republic'.

You may also want to take a look at: http://www.meetup.com/StopObamaNowSD/photos/13190242/ and http://californiascrusader.com/

======================================================

Something to pass on to my readers FYI:
Here is some info for you about planned protests, copied from an email to me today.

We have a "Anti-Obama" protest scheduled for Saturday, Feb 16th, stating at 11AM. It will be on the overpass at Severin and Fuerte Drives in San Diego.

We will have lots of extra signs to hand out to those, who don't have time to make their own. See the details, who's coming and RSVP here:

http://www.meetup.com/StopObamaNowSD/events/101525072/

There are other groups involved. I am expecting around 25-50 participants to turn out. Come on down and meet like-minded people, who oppose Obama's agenda and want to see him removed from office. Everyone is welcome, who wants to peacefully protest against Obama, his agenda and his abuse of office.

There will also be an Overpass protest in Brea, California by a separate group in the LA area. See this link for more info:
http://californiascrusader.com/event/

These protests are in sympathy with a national anti-Obama protest on the same day.
https://www.facebook.com/events/465323070194260/

Contact Roger directly at:  sonsandiego@gmail.com\

A local Georgia distraction:

Due to some local Georgia nonsense I have added the below to the top of this Impeach Obama blog site.

It seems that some Black local Georgia 'ministers' are playing on the same old clapped out 'white remorse' card in approaching White legislators to put forward some nonsense about how Georgia regrets slavery and apologizes for it.   

Details at:  http://kennesaw.patch.com/articles/should-georgia-officially-acknowledge-slavery#comments

 

A few of these legislators seem to have fallen for this crap and are putting this apology to the legislature for a vote. 

It has failed at least twice, and probably more times than that, so now Black 'ministers' are again playing the race card to try to get foolish young White Georgia Senators to introduce this piece of legislation.

If you are reading this and are actually Georgia residents, perhaps you can use the three addresses below and drop these folks a line about this issue.

Well, I wouldn't be too sure of that!

 

"Virgil, the President is not going to come here, confiscate your guns and force you to gay marry an illegal immigrant!"

======================================================

There are quite a lot of sites on the topic of impeaching Obama. Some of them are listed at: http://stop-obama-now.net/impeach-obama-coalition/#comment-13085  which also has put together the below 'List of Offenses' which you might want to take a look at. Also take a look at this U Tube item at:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEZNKB33U9c&feature=youtu.be

Direct links are given for other similar sites, you can keep busy looking at those and perhaps putting in your comments on some of them.

"Obama has committed the following offenses, many of which are impeachable or disqualifying him from holding office."

List of Offenses and Grievances

• In general, he has usurped the power of Congress and violated his oath to uphold the Constitution
• Even before he became president, he gave a couple of interviews that made it clear he does not believe the Constitution is valid today
• Has a radical, anti-American political and religious background, which has never been fully explained to the American people
• Refused to show that he is constitutional eligibility to hold office and, in fact, fights any investigation tooth and nail and at great expense, which implies a knowledge of ineligibility
• Does not conform to the constitutional requirement of being a “natural born citizen”
• Forged his draft card in an apparent attempt to hide the fact that he failed to register for the draft in violation of federal law
• Defrauded and provoked the public by posting a purported birth certificate on the White House website, which has obviously been manufactured with computer software.
• Lied about details of his life’s story in his auto-biography and elsewhere, in order to advance his political career (Claimed for years to be born in Kenya in his publishers bio.)
• Rejected the validity of the Constitution in public during a radio interview before he took office and cynically swore to uphold the Constitution, which he earlier declared to be no longer valid
• Set up a system of government “Czars” in order to usurp/bypass congressional authority
• Forced churches to accept practices at their medical institutions, which are a serious violation of their religious belief
• Is increasing US government debt at unsustainable rates
• His cronies in the Senate have refused to pass budgets are required by law in order to prevent the House of Representatives from de-funding his criminal activities.
• Wasted billions of stimulus funds on political cronies
• Smuggled a couple thousand illegal firearms to Mexican drug lords, who used them to kill dozens, of people, including the mass murder of 16 persons including 14 teenagers at a coming-out party and a US Border Patrol Agent
• Murdered three American citizens — one of them 16 years old — without due process in an unauthorized, illegal and undeclared terroristic drone war that has killed thousands, including many civilians and children
• Supported openly the “Occupy Movement,” which had anti-American, anarchist and communistic revolutionary objectives
• Waged war in Libya without the constitutionally required approval from Congress
• Refused to affirm in an open congressional hearing the sole right of Congress to declare war via his Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta
• Enforces the law selectively, according to his political agenda
• Refused to prosecute the New Black Panthers for blatant voter suppression
• Dictates new law via abuse of executive orders, as with immigration and gun control laws
• Aided radical Islamist groups, including the Muslim Brotherhood and elements of Al Qaeda in the destabilization and overthrow of various governments in the Middle East
• Deserted the American Ambassador and other Americans while they were under attack for his own personal political reasons
• Blatantly lied to the American public to cover his own culpability about the circumstances of the murders of the Ambassador and other Americans in Benghazi by an Islamic terrorist group
• Failed to pursue justice for the murderers of the Libyan ambassador, while the suspected leader of the terrorist group roams free and unhindered in Libya
• Has committed numerous other illegal acts and abuses of power while in office

Time to Wake Up America!

I am pleased to find that Rep Stockman from Texas has finally figured out that we need to IMPEACH Mr. Obama.  Something I have been saying for nearly two years, even writing to the President urging him not to seek reelection.  All this was quite some time before this 'gun control' issue came up.

Over and above gun control, Obama should never have been President.  Not because he is 'black' (or half black) but because he is totally incompetent, a product of the Chicago Daley machine.  Obama was a 'political organizer' which in Cook County means that he is a political hack and stooge for the Democratic Party in Chicago.

Americans were so anxious to prove that we, as a country, were so sorry for slavery that we wanted to show that we could elect a Black man as President.  It did not matter that the guy had no qualifications to be President - he was Black and many voters wanted to show that they liked Blacks, therefore he got elected.

It was simply political correctness taken to extremes.  The chickens are now coming home to roost.  His incompetence shows at every turn.  Even the hard core leftist Hollywood supporters are disappointed in him and they believe that once he got into office he sold them out and abandoned their far left agenda.

He is the Black Jimmy Carter and he is bad for America and should be impeached. 

Will this happen?  Realistically, No, it will not happen.  But we can try.

B.H., Kennesaw, Ga.

Misc Comment:  While I post the Stockman article below he, like most Representatives, has a nose in the air attitude towards input from people not in his district.  If you try to email him you have to enter your zip code and if you are not in his district this is what you get:

Zip Code Authentication Failed

The zip code entered indicates that you reside outside the 36th Congressional District of Texas. Due to the large volume of US mail, emails and faxes I receive, I am only able to accept messages from residents of the 36th District.

Stockman, like other Representatives fails to understand that while they are 'elected' by voters in their Districts and they are responsible to them, that they also represent the United States of America and if they find input from the rest of the Country to be not worth their time to consider then perhaps they should find other employment. 

Stockman's pay and benefits come from ALL of our taxes, not just from Texans in his District.  If he wants to use the national media to take on Obama then he should be available to contact from all of us and not just to those in his District. 

Hey, Stockman, are you part of the solution or just another part of the problem?

========================================================
Guns and Gear

GOP congressman threatens impeachment if Obama uses executive action for gun control
5:20 PM 01/14/2013

Read this article at: http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/14/gop-congressman-threatens-impeachment-if-obama-uses-executive-action-for-gun-control/#ixzz2I3QiuRQU

　
Texas Republican Rep. Steve Stockman threatened Monday afternoon that he would file articles of impeachment against President Barack Obama if he institutes gun control measures with an executive order.

Stockman warned that such executive orders would be "unconstitutional" and "infringe on our constitutionally-protected right to keep and bear arms."
(RELATED: Levin: If Obama sidesteps Congress on debt ceiling, ‘no choice’ but impeachment)

"I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment," Stockman said in a statement.

At his press conference Monday, Obama floated the
possibility of using executive action to enact policies aimed at reducing gun violence.

The freshman congressman, who served one term in Congress in the mid-1990s, further labeled the possibility "an existential threat to this nation" because, he said, the purpose of the Second Amendment is to allow the people to protect themselves from tyranny. (RELATED VIDEO — Walter Williams: People misunderstand the point of the Second Amendment)

"Any proposal to abuse executive power and infringe upon gun rights must be repelled with the stiffest legislative force possible," he added. "Under no circumstances whatsoever may the government take any action that disarms any peaceable person — much less without due process through an executive declaration without a vote of Congress or a ruling of a court."

He concluded by claiming that an executive order would be not just "not just an attack on the Constitution," but also an "attack on Americans."

"If the president is allowed to suspend constitutional rights on his own personal whims, our free republic has effectively ceased to exist," he said.

Contact Stockman at:  http://stockman.house.gov or write to him: 

Citizens File Articles of Impeachment Against Obama

• Articlee is From this site:  http://www.infowars.com/citizens-file-article-of-impeachment-against-obama/

For sedition against the Constitution
Alex Jones - Infowars.com - January 15, 2013

“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776.

There can no longer be any doubt – the forces of tyranny are running wild across our once great Republic. The time has come for all good men and women to rally to the aid of their country. We have now entered a historic crossroads that will decide the destiny of the United States. Arrogance and corruption has long festered in Washington DC, but the last decade has seen an extreme acceleration of criminal looting and attacks on liberty – every freedom is under sustained assault.

We the People, the rightful masters of this Republic, will either rise up through Congress and the states or we can trade in our birthright of liberty for the chains of a technocratic slavery. Below we list some of the more egregious acts of seditious treason against the Republic of the United States. Anyone who wishes to continue to live in a free country and to pass that birthright on to their children must research this document and then lobby state legislatures and the Congress to do their duty and remove the would-be dictator.

 

The time has now come for a bill of impeachment to be introduced and debated in Congress. Obama’s crimes are public, and the debate in the House will serve as a court in which to display the tyrannical activities of President Obama and his cohorts. As in the case of Richard Nixon, the exposure of Obama’s crimes may cause him to resign in disgrace. If he does not step down, the full House will then vote to begin the impeachment trial in the US Senate. The time has now come to make your decision – to stand up to evil or get on your knees as a willing slave.

Articles of Impeachment Against Barack Hussein Obama – Filed by Citizen Alexander Emric Jones, January 15, 2013.

- He has clearly communicated his intent to eviscerate the second amendment rights of American citizens by pursuing executive orders to curtail the right to keep and bear arms without congressional authorization and in violation of the second amendment.

 

Below, Congressman Stockman has pledged to move for impeachment against Obama. I am standing up against Obama right beside him, will you?

“The President’s actions are an existential threat to this nation,” reads a statement by Rep. Steve Stockman. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms is what has kept this nation free and secure for over 200 years. The very purpose of the Second Amendment is to stop the government from disallowing people the means to defend themselves against tyranny. Any proposal to abuse executive power and infringe upon gun rights must be repelled with the stiffest legislative force possible.”

- He has aided America’s enemies, violating his oath, by sending funds to insurgents in Syria who are being commanded by Al-Qaeda terrorists.

- He has violated federal law by overseeing a cover-up surrounding Operation Fast and Furious, the transfer of guns to Mexican drug cartels direct from the federal government.

 

- He has lied to the American people by overseeing a cover-up of the Benghazi attack which directly led to the deaths of four American citizens. The cover-up has been called “Obama’s Watergate,” yet four months after the incident, no one in the administration has been held accountable.

 

- He has brazenly undermined the power of Congress by insisting his authority came from the United Nations Security Council prior to the attack on Libya and that Congressional approval was not necessary. “I don’t even have to get to the Constitutional question,” said Obama. This is an act that “constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution,” according to Congressman Walter Jones.

 

- He has flagrantly violated article 1, section 9, clause 8 of the Constitution by accepting rotating status as chairman of the United Nations Security Council. The clause states, “No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States; and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall without consent of Congress accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.”

 

- He has ignored Congressional rejection of the cybersecurity bill and instead indicated he will pursue an unconstitutional executive order.

 

- He has signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act which includes provisions that permit the abduction and military detention without trial of U.S. citizens, violating Habeas Corpus. Despite Obama claiming he would not use the provisions to incarcerate U.S. citizens, it was his administration that specifically demanded these powers be included in the final NDAA bill.

 

- He has enacted universal health care mandates that force Americans to buy health insurance, a clear violation of the Constitution in exceeding congressional power to regulate interstate commerce. Obama has also handed out preferential waivers to corporations friendly to his administration.

 

- He has declared war on America’s coal industry by promising to bankrupt any company that attempts to build a new coal plant while using unconstitutional EPA regulations to strangle competition, ensuring Americans see their energy costs rise year after year.

 

- He has violated the Constitution’s Takings and Due Process Clauses when he bullied the secured creditors of automaker Chrysler into accepting 30 cents on the dollar while politically connected labor unions and preferential others received better deals.

 

- He has violated Article II of the Constitution by using signing statements as part of his executive usurpation of power.

“I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment.”

Rep. Steve Stockman, Texas.

For these, and other offenses which constitute high crimes and misdemeanors, including perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, conduct unbecoming and refusal to obey a lawful order, we call for the immediate impeachment of Barack H. Obama.

Impeachment Clauses in the Constitution
Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5

The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

Article 1, Section 3, Clauses 6 and 7

The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried the Chief Justice shall preside; And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgement in Cases of Impreachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law.

Article 2, Section 4

The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Article 3, Section 1

. . . The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour. . . .

==================================================

Impeachment is picking up steam as more citizens are making it an issue:

Levin: If Obama sidesteps Congress on debt ceiling, ‘no choice’ but impeachment

Read more at: http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/14/levin-if-obama-sidesteps-congress-on-debt-ceiling-no-choice-but-impeachment/#ixzz2IGYXMNXB

　
On his Monday radio show, conservative talker Mark Levin said that if President Barack Obama sidesteps Congress on the debt ceiling fight and attacks the Congress’ constitutionally enumerated "core power" – that is control over spending and taxing — through executive action, Congress will have "no choice" but impeachment.

Levin explained that if unilateral action by the White House — which White House spokesman Jay Carney ruled out — were to happen, it would infringe on Congress’ "core power" and should be punished with impeachment.

"Now, if Obama unilaterally acts — and I think there’s a fan-dance going on here where his spokes-idiot [Jay] Carney is out there saying, ‘No, we’ve decided we’re not going to do this’ — if Obama, though, plays the role of Hamlet and in the end says ‘I have no choice: The Republicans are going to destroy our economy, our debt rating, all this that and the other, therefore I must unilaterally act,’ he should be impeached," Levin declared. "Because that means Congress’ core power — in addition to declaring war — Congress’ core power, that is control over spending and taxing, will have been seized by the president of the United States in one executive order."

"No Congress would tolerate this from any president," Levin continued. "I don’t care if the president was Abraham Lincoln. This Congress would not have tolerated it from Richard Nixon. No Congress can tolerate such a complete and brazen frontal assault on its enumerated power. No Congress. No twisting of the language in the 14th Amendment or any way else, because we will cease to be a federal government of three coequal branches. We will cease to be that."

And that, Levin said, would throw the entire American constitutional system of government out of order.

"And what are we going to do, ladies and gentlemen?" he said. "Throw our entire system away? Our entire Constitution away? Our entire financial system away for Obama? Why?"

"So, if a president commits a high crime and misdemeanor, which in this case is a brazen frontal attack on the Constitution itself in a way that no president has ever attacked the Constitution — seizing power unilaterally from the Congress — then we have no choice, do we?" Levin added. "Do we, than to remove him

Readers might find this site of interest:
http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/
  and here is one of the posts from it:

Right Of Armed Self-defense Against Tyranny NOT Negotiable, Mr. Obama

January 15, 2013 By George Spelvin Comments (12)

inShare5

 

A nationwide appeal has been sent to gun owners and their families asking they go to their state capitol this Saturday, January 19, from noon to 3 p. m. to show support for our 2^nd Amendment rights. In Florida, gun owners are asked to meet in the “middle of the state” at noon, at the Hernando County Fairgrounds, 6436 Broad St., Brooksville, FL 334601.

This urgent call to action is in response to the Barack Obama/Joe Biden/Dianne Feinstein legislative aim of imposing bans on arbitrarily selected groups of firearms and accessories. One North Carolina police lieutenant warns internet audiences that ”We’re in huge trouble.” A devout Christian, the 31 year police veteran tells listeners that “I cry. . .when guns are gone, you won’t be able to worship the Creator. ..gone. . .Freedoms gone.”

An officer who lives near the site of the Sandy Hook killings is concerned that “We are being set up to confiscate our guns. . .we can’t back away. . .these people are coming at us head on. . .we must tell our legislators…we will not tolerate confiscation or ban[s] on our guns.”

When asked what he thought about Obama wanting to take our guns, an elderly veteran at a Florida rec hall said “That’s not happening.” Quoting the soldier’s oath, he said. . .”to defend [the Constitution of the United States] against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” He emphasized domestic.

Firearms trainer and consultant Kelly Alwood would agree with the old soldier. “[Without the Second Amendment] there is no way to resist the government voiding all other amendments,” said Alwood during an interview with the Blaze. “Why should [the government] continue to give you your freedom of speech if there is no one to stop them? It [the 2nd Amendment] is the only safeguard we have to protect us from a tyrannical government.”

Naturally, the left is eager to ridicule “worriers” like Alwood, immediately characterizing all who voice such concerns as ‘nuts’ or ‘conspiracy theorists.’ But mistrust of the motives of governments that have disarmed their “subjects” is quite legitimate as the histories of Nazi Germany, the USSR, and China have so clearly illustrated.

To the Founders of this nation, the right to keep and bear arms became nothing more complicated than “…the right of armed self-defense against tyranny.” Indeed, that was the purpose of this right as later expressed in the 2^nd Amendment. And in spite of the best efforts of modern hoplophobes and would-be tyrants to confuse the issue, it has not changed to this day.

For as eager as gun-banning politicians have been to change the focus of the gun control discussion to one of hunting or target shooting, the truth of their disarmament agenda never stays hidden for long. New York Governor Cuomo made that clear with his statement that “confiscation might be an option” when placed in conjunction with his plans for an “assault weapons” ban.

Sorry, Mr. Governor. We’ll not negotiate away our means of remaining free from the likes of you.
 

 

Click on links for Congressional addresses

Direct link to Directory of members of the House of Representatives 113th Congress, 1st Session: http://www.house.gov/representatives/

Direct Link to Directory of Senators of the 113th Congress 1st Session: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?OrderBy=party&Sort

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you enjoyed this consumer protest blog site you might also want to look at some others that I have put up over the years:

Our local Atlanta newspaper and how it is littering the Metro area
http://www.atlantajournal-constitution.blogspot.com/

A 3rd class utility billing firm from Chicago with accounts all over the USA
http://aumsucks.blogspot.com/

A Georgia Pawn Shop that got run out of town
http://kennesawpawnproblems.blogspot.com/

A retail chain that sued me for 23 months for posting their AP Directives
http://targetfiling.blogspot.com/

A condo that I lived in 2007-2013, glad to be gone
http://nautiluscondosrules.blogspot.com/

A good local restaurant in Kennesaw, Ga
http://mycountrykitchenkennesaw.blogspot.com/

A former lawyer of mine in Florida, now in jail
http://rscottwhitehead.blogspot.com/

Bank of America and my experience with this stupid bank
http://bankofamericageorgiasucks.blogspot.com/

Our county library which needs a good kick in the ass
http://cobbcountylibrary.blogspot.com/

A friend got screwed by this insurance firm, he came out OK in the end
http://westernworldinsurancegroup.blogspot.com/

A restaurant chain with its head up its ass
http://huddlehouserestaurants.blogspot.com/

The 'Flagship' of a 140 property management firm
http://northbridgesucks.blogspot.com/

My dealings with AT&T U-verse
http://u-versesucks.blogspot.com/

Target Stores 2006 Security Manual
http://targetapdirectives2006.blogspot.com/

Another blog about the management firm
http://concordsucks.blogspot.com/

A good local restaurant in Kennesaw
http://theboxcarcafe.blogspot.com/